How public health agencies are manufacturing uncertainty about Covid treatments. Suppressing data on ivermectin cost ‘half a million lives’

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org


“In a recent Zoom call, Dr. Pierre Kory of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance outlined numerous details showing the World Health Organization (WHO) knowingly suppressed data on the effectiveness of ivermectin against the virus in order to benefit the vaccine interests of Big Pharma.

“It’s criminal,” Kory said. “It’s literally criminal.” The drug “could have saved half a million lives this year if it had been approved.”

The WHO, Kory contends, is simply taking part in the tactics of a time-worn “Disinformation Playbook.” The term was coined by the Union of Concerned Scientists 50 years ago to describe the strategies corporations have developed over decades to “attack science when it goes against their financial interests.”

It consists of five parts:

  1. The Fake – Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research.
  2. The Blitz – Harass scientists who speak out with results reviews inconvenient for industry.
  3. The Diversion – Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists.
  4. The Screen – Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies.
  5. The Fix – Manipulate government officials or processes to influence policy inappropriately.
In the full Zoom call, since removed by YouTube but available on Bitchute, Kory describes how the five tactics have been deployed against the scientific findings on ivermectin. One example is the corruption of leading medical journals, whose editors refuse to allow ivermectin studies to advance to peer review. The most egregious institutional participant, however, is the WHO.

Kory is the lead author of a scientific review of the studies on ivermectin worldwide, which was published in the May-June edition of The American Journal of Therapeutics.

As reported on the FlCCC website, there have been a total of 56 trials involving 469 scientists and 18,447 patients. Of these, 28 were randomized control trials (RCT), the type of trial considered highly authoritative in the medical community.

Together these have shown an 85 percent improvement as a preventative against the disease when taken before exposure. There has been a 78 percent patient improvement when administered early and a 46 percent improvement when delivered late. A 74 percent improvement in mortality was found and a 66 percent improvement across multiple areas in the 28 randomized control trials.

Within only 10 days of publication the paper on ivermectin was rated number 13 most-read among the more than 200,000 other scientific publications that appeared during that time, Kory reports.

Out of the 17.7 million papers that have been tracked by the rating source since it began, the ivermectin study is already ranked 246.

Kory believes the response to the paper is a good sign, and says he sees “a sea change happening.”

Kory notes his team is hardly alone. “Dr. [Tess] Lawrie is one of the world’s experts in making guidelines and doing systematic reviews. Just her group alone and their independent effort, the BIRD (British Ivermectin Recommendation Development) consortium, they arrived at the conclusion that it should be the standard of care. Our article also arrived at that same conclusion. We are not alone. Prof. [Satoshi] Omura, the Nobel prize winner, his group from Japan, published their paper concluding the same. Another independent group from Spain and Italy” did so.

Most importantly, he said, “the key about all of these groups… is that we are independent expert panels. None of us are conflicted. None of us have any other interests than the oath that we took as physicians which is to the care of our patients.”

Part of the problem is that the WHO’s corporate donors not only provide funds, they determine all aspects of research and even provide the research teams.

“Look at where the money is coming from. Now the money has strings attached,” Kory said. “People give the WHO money, but they say ‘we want you to do this or study that. We want you to use our consultants and our experts, and our scientists.’ Many of them come from pharma. Pharma has pretty much completely infilatrated this organization.”

When “you look critically at the medicine, especially in a pandemic, you can’t help but arrive at an objective conclusion that it is the standard of care,” Kory said. “And it really is doing phenomenal impacts around the world.”

In Mexico and India for example, “the death rates and hospitalizations just absolutely plummeted” where ivermectin was used.

The real problem with the drug, Kory believes, is that in addition to being effective, safe, and easily available, it is very cheap. Ivermectin costs only a few dollars per dose. This pits the drug against financial interests of over 100 billions of dollars to be made from vaccines.

“I can’t imagine in the history of pharmaceuticals, a competing interest as deep and as vast as is arrayed against little ivermectin,” Kory said. “It is truly almost incalculable the interest against it.”

Once trusted healthcare agencies such as the WHO, have become the chief advocates of the interests of their Big Pharma, vaccine-driven donors. As a result, Kory said, the WHO and others, are actively suppressing the vast evidence for ivermectin in order to keep it out of public view.

The evidence for this claim is startling. Looking at the WHO’s panel report on ivermectin, he said, “The stuff that they are doing is not subtle. It is so clear that whoever was in charge of that panel had a nonscientific objective.”
…”
 

indynittany

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2005
5,352
6,285
1



“In a recent Zoom call, Dr. Pierre Kory of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance outlined numerous details showing the World Health Organization (WHO) knowingly suppressed data on the effectiveness of ivermectin against the virus in order to benefit the vaccine interests of Big Pharma.

“It’s criminal,” Kory said. “It’s literally criminal.” The drug “could have saved half a million lives this year if it had been approved.”

The WHO, Kory contends, is simply taking part in the tactics of a time-worn “Disinformation Playbook.” The term was coined by the Union of Concerned Scientists 50 years ago to describe the strategies corporations have developed over decades to “attack science when it goes against their financial interests.”

It consists of five parts:

  1. The Fake – Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research.
  2. The Blitz – Harass scientists who speak out with results reviews inconvenient for industry.
  3. The Diversion – Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists.
  4. The Screen – Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies.
  5. The Fix – Manipulate government officials or processes to influence policy inappropriately.
In the full Zoom call, since removed by YouTube but available on Bitchute, Kory describes how the five tactics have been deployed against the scientific findings on ivermectin. One example is the corruption of leading medical journals, whose editors refuse to allow ivermectin studies to advance to peer review. The most egregious institutional participant, however, is the WHO.

Kory is the lead author of a scientific review of the studies on ivermectin worldwide, which was published in the May-June edition of The American Journal of Therapeutics.

As reported on the FlCCC website, there have been a total of 56 trials involving 469 scientists and 18,447 patients. Of these, 28 were randomized control trials (RCT), the type of trial considered highly authoritative in the medical community.

Together these have shown an 85 percent improvement as a preventative against the disease when taken before exposure. There has been a 78 percent patient improvement when administered early and a 46 percent improvement when delivered late. A 74 percent improvement in mortality was found and a 66 percent improvement across multiple areas in the 28 randomized control trials.

Within only 10 days of publication the paper on ivermectin was rated number 13 most-read among the more than 200,000 other scientific publications that appeared during that time, Kory reports.

Out of the 17.7 million papers that have been tracked by the rating source since it began, the ivermectin study is already ranked 246.

Kory believes the response to the paper is a good sign, and says he sees “a sea change happening.”

Kory notes his team is hardly alone. “Dr. [Tess] Lawrie is one of the world’s experts in making guidelines and doing systematic reviews. Just her group alone and their independent effort, the BIRD (British Ivermectin Recommendation Development) consortium, they arrived at the conclusion that it should be the standard of care. Our article also arrived at that same conclusion. We are not alone. Prof. [Satoshi] Omura, the Nobel prize winner, his group from Japan, published their paper concluding the same. Another independent group from Spain and Italy” did so.

Most importantly, he said, “the key about all of these groups… is that we are independent expert panels. None of us are conflicted. None of us have any other interests than the oath that we took as physicians which is to the care of our patients.”

Part of the problem is that the WHO’s corporate donors not only provide funds, they determine all aspects of research and even provide the research teams.

“Look at where the money is coming from. Now the money has strings attached,” Kory said. “People give the WHO money, but they say ‘we want you to do this or study that. We want you to use our consultants and our experts, and our scientists.’ Many of them come from pharma. Pharma has pretty much completely infilatrated this organization.”

When “you look critically at the medicine, especially in a pandemic, you can’t help but arrive at an objective conclusion that it is the standard of care,” Kory said. “And it really is doing phenomenal impacts around the world.”

In Mexico and India for example, “the death rates and hospitalizations just absolutely plummeted” where ivermectin was used.

The real problem with the drug, Kory believes, is that in addition to being effective, safe, and easily available, it is very cheap. Ivermectin costs only a few dollars per dose. This pits the drug against financial interests of over 100 billions of dollars to be made from vaccines.

“I can’t imagine in the history of pharmaceuticals, a competing interest as deep and as vast as is arrayed against little ivermectin,” Kory said. “It is truly almost incalculable the interest against it.”

Once trusted healthcare agencies such as the WHO, have become the chief advocates of the interests of their Big Pharma, vaccine-driven donors. As a result, Kory said, the WHO and others, are actively suppressing the vast evidence for ivermectin in order to keep it out of public view.

The evidence for this claim is startling. Looking at the WHO’s panel report on ivermectin, he said, “The stuff that they are doing is not subtle. It is so clear that whoever was in charge of that panel had a nonscientific objective.”
…”
Hammering Bill Gates and Ken Frazier. Doesn't get much better than that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
Hammering Bill Gates and Ken Frazier. Doesn't get much better than that!
+1 on that!

Write up about the impact Ivermectin had in just a few weeks in Mexico City:

An initiative in Mexico City to prescribe ivermectin to COVID-19 positive patients has resulted in a 52–76 percent reduction in hospitalizations.

 

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
It’s absolutely criminal that NIH and WHO are still recommending Tylenol and water in 2021. There is still no approved treatment for all stages of COVID-19 they claim. Evil pieces of shit.

 

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
There’s so much data that it works that at this point any person/entity shilling against ivermectin is either ignorant or evil. Almost all the hit pieces will reference a single low powered study to hang their hat on even though there are numerous studies (including RCT’s) showing great effectiveness.

0wdHYNQ.png


Here is some great discussion with Dr. Kory on the censorship, medical authoritarianism, insane approach by the medical establishment towards covid19 treatment/Ivermectin, etc.

 
Last edited:

rumble_lion

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2011
19,143
4,232
1
There’s so much data that it works that at this point any person/entity shilling against ivermectin is either ignorant or evil. Almost all the hit pieces will reference a single low powered study to hang their hat on even though there are numerous studies (including RCT’s) showing great effectiveness.

0wdHYNQ.png


Here is some great discussion on the censorship, insane approach by the medical establishment towards covid19 treatment/Ivermectin, etc.



Oops, I guess India missed all the evidence.

The Union Health Ministry and Family Welfare's directorate general of health services (DGHS) has issued revised guidelines to stop the use of Ivermectin and Doxycycline in Covid-19 treatment. The new guidelines have dropped all medicines, except antipyretic and antitussive, for asymptomatic and mild cases.​
 

indynittany

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2005
5,352
6,285
1
There’s so much data that it works that at this point any person/entity shilling against ivermectin is either ignorant or evil. Almost all the hit pieces will reference a single low powered study to hang their hat on even though there are numerous studies (including RCT’s) showing great effectiveness.

0wdHYNQ.png


Here is some great discussion on the censorship, insane approach by the medical establishment towards covid19 treatment/Ivermectin, etc.

The first television ad for a proscription drug aired in 1983. Last year, the drug industry spent almost $6.6 billion. I believe the drug companies are now the largest advertisers on TV.

Eisenhower warned of the military industrial complex. I believe we are now seeing the pharmaceutical industrial complex exerting its muscles., not just in the media, but with agencies like the NIH and WHO.

Occam's Razor
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

gjbankos

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jan 16, 2006
57,935
34,768
1
Oops, I guess India missed all the evidence.

The Union Health Ministry and Family Welfare's directorate general of health services (DGHS) has issued revised guidelines to stop the use of Ivermectin and Doxycycline in Covid-19 treatment. The new guidelines have dropped all medicines, except antipyretic and antitussive, for asymptomatic and mild cases.​
You missed all the evidence too. And that's because you aren't here to engage, Ramble. For a year now we've all been showing the evidence. All you do is post "oops" and "I guess"

You are just a bore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

rumble_lion

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2011
19,143
4,232
1
You missed all the evidence too. And that's because you aren't here to engage, Ramble. For a year now we've all been showing the evidence. All you do is post "oops" and "I guess"

You are just a bore.

You must have missed whole point of the post. India has stopped using Ivermectin to treat Covid patients. Do you think they did that because is was working?
 

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
You must have missed whole point of the post. India has stopped using Ivermectin to treat Covid patients. Do you think they did that because is was working?
Did you not read the OP? It explains why this is happening. Almost all national health orgs have demonized it. Big pharma spends billions on lobbying around the world for a reason. There are billions at stake here.

Read Dr. Kory’s review of the metadata and peer reviewed studies. The data showing it saves lives is overwhelming.


Nothing to see here:
tileshop_pmc_inline.html
tileshop_pmc_inline.html



 
Last edited:

BoulderFish

Well-Known Member
Oct 31, 2016
9,786
6,128
1
Check out the comment section on this study. Wow.


@WeR0206 @indynittany @rumble_lion @interrobang
 

rumble_lion

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2011
19,143
4,232
1
Did you not read the OP? It explains why this is happening. Almost all national health orgs have demonized it. Big pharma spends billions on lobbying around the world for a reason. There are billions at stake here.

Read Dr. Kory’s review of the metadata and peer reviewed studies. The data showing it saves lives is overwhelming.


Nothing to see here:
tileshop_pmc_inline.html
tileshop_pmc_inline.html




Did you not read the OP? It explains why this is happening. Almost all national health orgs have demonized it. Big pharma spends billions on lobbying around the world for a reason. There are billions at stake here.

Did you not know that India isn't really all that into Big Pharma? I know it's hard to believe that a country would put it's own citizens health in front the needs of Big Pharma because we live in the US and don't ever really see that kind of thing happen.

Two recent court cases in India may have changed the rules of the game. On 1 April, pharma giant Novartis lost a six-year legal battle after the Indian supreme court ruled that small changes to its leukaemia drug Glivec did not deserve a new patent.​
Campaigners had long highlighted this as a clear case of "evergreening" – making minor alterations to existing drugs in order to secure a new patent, and so extend its monopoly (Glivec costs patients $2,600 (£1,670) a month). And only one month before, India upheld a compulsory licence of Bayer's cancer drug Nexavar, effectively allowing generics firms to copy a patented drug, reportedly bringing the price down from more than $5,500 (£3,540) per month to $175 (£112). Both rulings are landmark cases, vehemently criticised by both Big Pharma and major drugs-producing countries.​
 

bourbon n blues

Well-Known Member
Nov 20, 2019
9,898
11,172
1


The officials investigated the possibility vaccine development began prior to the time Beijing admitted to the World Health Organization there was an outbreak on Dec. 31, 2019. They raised the explosive issue in an internal report without forming any conclusions.

“It may seem likely that the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been researching a vaccine before the outbreak,” the State Department analysis authored by Miles Yu stated.

Patent applications “may give credence to the following possibility: prior to the surprise outbreak in its close vicinity, WIV had possessed the novel coronavirus in its lab and had known of its lethality and pathogenicity for a while. It had been actively researching a vaccine before anyone else could succeed, thus giving China the sole patent right.”

In mid-January 2020, Fauci donated free Remdesivir samples to China for an experimental clinical trial to see if it was effective against COVID-19.

Remdesivir was an American invention, developed by Fort Detrick scientists and the American pharmaceutical company GILEAD, using taxpayer funds.

After Fauci donated the samples, the Wuhan Institute of Virology compiled a commercial patent for the same treatment on Jan. 19 — before it had even acknowledged human-to-human transmission – in a case of likely intellectual property theft.

“It raises the possibility that WIV has been researching a COVID-19 vaccine of its own all along, and would like to prevent GILEAD’s Remdesivir from entering the Chinese market,” the State Department analysis prepared for Pompeo states.

Fauci should be hung, the left is wrong, again , as usual. The hack doctor is a traitor .
 

bourbon n blues

Well-Known Member
Nov 20, 2019
9,898
11,172
1



“In a recent Zoom call, Dr. Pierre Kory of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance outlined numerous details showing the World Health Organization (WHO) knowingly suppressed data on the effectiveness of ivermectin against the virus in order to benefit the vaccine interests of Big Pharma.

“It’s criminal,” Kory said. “It’s literally criminal.” The drug “could have saved half a million lives this year if it had been approved.”

The WHO, Kory contends, is simply taking part in the tactics of a time-worn “Disinformation Playbook.” The term was coined by the Union of Concerned Scientists 50 years ago to describe the strategies corporations have developed over decades to “attack science when it goes against their financial interests.”

It consists of five parts:

  1. The Fake – Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research.
  2. The Blitz – Harass scientists who speak out with results reviews inconvenient for industry.
  3. The Diversion – Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists.
  4. The Screen – Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies.
  5. The Fix – Manipulate government officials or processes to influence policy inappropriately.
In the full Zoom call, since removed by YouTube but available on Bitchute, Kory describes how the five tactics have been deployed against the scientific findings on ivermectin. One example is the corruption of leading medical journals, whose editors refuse to allow ivermectin studies to advance to peer review. The most egregious institutional participant, however, is the WHO.

Kory is the lead author of a scientific review of the studies on ivermectin worldwide, which was published in the May-June edition of The American Journal of Therapeutics.

As reported on the FlCCC website, there have been a total of 56 trials involving 469 scientists and 18,447 patients. Of these, 28 were randomized control trials (RCT), the type of trial considered highly authoritative in the medical community.

Together these have shown an 85 percent improvement as a preventative against the disease when taken before exposure. There has been a 78 percent patient improvement when administered early and a 46 percent improvement when delivered late. A 74 percent improvement in mortality was found and a 66 percent improvement across multiple areas in the 28 randomized control trials.

Within only 10 days of publication the paper on ivermectin was rated number 13 most-read among the more than 200,000 other scientific publications that appeared during that time, Kory reports.

Out of the 17.7 million papers that have been tracked by the rating source since it began, the ivermectin study is already ranked 246.

Kory believes the response to the paper is a good sign, and says he sees “a sea change happening.”

Kory notes his team is hardly alone. “Dr. [Tess] Lawrie is one of the world’s experts in making guidelines and doing systematic reviews. Just her group alone and their independent effort, the BIRD (British Ivermectin Recommendation Development) consortium, they arrived at the conclusion that it should be the standard of care. Our article also arrived at that same conclusion. We are not alone. Prof. [Satoshi] Omura, the Nobel prize winner, his group from Japan, published their paper concluding the same. Another independent group from Spain and Italy” did so.

Most importantly, he said, “the key about all of these groups… is that we are independent expert panels. None of us are conflicted. None of us have any other interests than the oath that we took as physicians which is to the care of our patients.”

Part of the problem is that the WHO’s corporate donors not only provide funds, they determine all aspects of research and even provide the research teams.

“Look at where the money is coming from. Now the money has strings attached,” Kory said. “People give the WHO money, but they say ‘we want you to do this or study that. We want you to use our consultants and our experts, and our scientists.’ Many of them come from pharma. Pharma has pretty much completely infilatrated this organization.”

When “you look critically at the medicine, especially in a pandemic, you can’t help but arrive at an objective conclusion that it is the standard of care,” Kory said. “And it really is doing phenomenal impacts around the world.”

In Mexico and India for example, “the death rates and hospitalizations just absolutely plummeted” where ivermectin was used.

The real problem with the drug, Kory believes, is that in addition to being effective, safe, and easily available, it is very cheap. Ivermectin costs only a few dollars per dose. This pits the drug against financial interests of over 100 billions of dollars to be made from vaccines.

“I can’t imagine in the history of pharmaceuticals, a competing interest as deep and as vast as is arrayed against little ivermectin,” Kory said. “It is truly almost incalculable the interest against it.”

Once trusted healthcare agencies such as the WHO, have become the chief advocates of the interests of their Big Pharma, vaccine-driven donors. As a result, Kory said, the WHO and others, are actively suppressing the vast evidence for ivermectin in order to keep it out of public view.

The evidence for this claim is startling. Looking at the WHO’s panel report on ivermectin, he said, “The stuff that they are doing is not subtle. It is so clear that whoever was in charge of that panel had a nonscientific objective.”
…”


In mid-January 2020, Fauci donated free Remdesivir samples to China for an experimental clinical trial to see if it was effective against COVID-19. From the article I posted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
Check out the comment section on this study. Wow.


@WeR0206 @indynittany @rumble_lion @interrobang
The authors are getting crushed and rightfully so. This “study” is a perfect example of what is talked about in the OP. Thanks for sharing.
Did you not read the OP? It explains why this is happening. Almost all national health orgs have demonized it. Big pharma spends billions on lobbying around the world for a reason. There are billions at stake here.

Did you not know that India isn't really all that into Big Pharma? I know it's hard to believe that a country would put it's own citizens health in front the needs of Big Pharma because we live in the US and don't ever really see that kind of thing happen.

Two recent court cases in India may have changed the rules of the game. On 1 April, pharma giant Novartis lost a six-year legal battle after the Indian supreme court ruled that small changes to its leukaemia drug Glivec did not deserve a new patent.​
Campaigners had long highlighted this as a clear case of "evergreening" – making minor alterations to existing drugs in order to secure a new patent, and so extend its monopoly (Glivec costs patients $2,600 (£1,670) a month). And only one month before, India upheld a compulsory licence of Bayer's cancer drug Nexavar, effectively allowing generics firms to copy a patented drug, reportedly bringing the price down from more than $5,500 (£3,540) per month to $175 (£112). Both rulings are landmark cases, vehemently criticised by both Big Pharma and major drugs-producing countries.​
Nice deflection. Did you look at Dr. Kory’s review of the data and charts I linked?

This one example you provided doesn’t counter Dr Kory’s review nor the charts. Do you not think certain states in India are swayed by the positions the WHO and the NIH here in the US take? If big pharma can influence those two orgs alone it trickles down to many other countries.

Look at ivermectin’s impact on Mexico city and the few states in India, Peru, etc. that widely deployed it. The impacts were miraculous can’t be attributed to the vaccine either bc their vax rates are very low.


Here is a great interview with Dr. Kory summarizing the data and the David vs. goliath battle Ivermectin is facing.

 
Last edited:

rumble_lion

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2011
19,143
4,232
1
The authors are getting crushed and rightfully so. This “study” is a perfect example of what is talked about in the OP. Thanks for sharing.

Nice deflection. Did you look at Dr. Kory’s review of the data and charts I linked?

This one example you provided doesn’t counter Dr Kory’s review nor the charts. Do you not think certain states in India are swayed by the positions the WHO and the NIH here in the US take? If big pharma can influence those two orgs alone it trickles down to many other countries.

Look at ivermectin’s impact on Mexico city and the few states in India, Peru, etc. that widely deployed it. The impacts were miraculous can’t be attributed to the vaccine either bc their vax rates are very low.


Here is a great interview with Dr. Kory summarizing the data and the David vs. goliath battle Ivermectin is facing.


Nice deflection. Did you look at Dr. Kory’s review of the data and charts I linked?

Did you just take all the posts you made months ago touting hydroxychloroquine and searched/replaced hydroxychloroquine with ivermectin?
 

indynittany

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2005
5,352
6,285
1
Check out the comment section on this study. Wow.


@WeR0206 @indynittany @rumble_lion @interrobang
Wow! Those comments are telling! Thanks for posting.
 

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
Nice deflection. Did you look at Dr. Kory’s review of the data and charts I linked?

Did you just take all the posts you made months ago touting hydroxychloroquine and searched/replaced hydroxychloroquine with ivermectin?
Stop trying to deflect and change the subject. Ffs that’s all you ever do. Comment on the quality of Dr. Kory’s review of the Ivermectin data or gtfo of the thread.

Both HCQ and Ivermectin have been proven in numerous RCT’s as well as the front lines to be highly effective especially when given early to outpatients but Ivermectin is even better than HCQ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: indynittany

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
Here’s a look behind the curtain re: how news agencies were censoring covid19 treatments such as HCQ. These people need to be charged!


Here’s another link due to google censorship:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: indynittany

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
Bump. Hopefully each of these corrupt evil public health officials who have been squashing safe, cheap, and effective drugs for early outpatient treatment will see justice.


The Indian Bar Association (IBA) sued WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan on May 25, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin. There is also an updated legal notice on June 13, 2021.

Point 56 states, “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.”

If a trial in India finds WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan guilty then the WHO Scientist could be sentenced to death or life in prison. Dr Soumya Swaminathan would have be charged with the threatened criminal prosecution and be found guilty on one of the those charges.

The Government of Tamil Nadu has published new treatment protocols for COVID-19 patients that leaves out the use of ivermectin, which had been included in a previous version. The new protocols describe three categories of COVID-19 patients based on the level of care they need: home-based, primary care and pre-hospital care. It leaves hospital care out. The tests to determine the category to which a patient belongs are oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate.

Advocate Dipali Ojha, lead attorney for the Indian Bar Association, threatened criminal prosecution against Dr. Swaminathan “for each death” caused by her acts of commission and omission. The brief accused Swaminathan of misconduct by using her position as a health authority to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an EUA for the lucrative vaccine industry.
Ivermectin is a cheap drug that is prescribed as an anti-parasitic. It has been gaining in popularity for preventing COVID-19. The WHO and FDA are not approving Ivermectin but many doctors and scientists believe Ivermectin is effective. There is the claim that the Indian States that used Ivermectin had far better outcomes and far fewer COVID deaths than the Indian states that did not use Ivermectin.

Among the most prominent examples include the Ivermectin areas of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa where cases dropped 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. By contrast, Tamil Nadu opted out of Ivermectin. As a result, their cases skyrocketed and rose to the highest in India. Tamil Nadu deaths increased ten-fold.

In a test of over 4000 people in India (3000+ took Ivermectin) and over 1000 did not. The results were that 2% Ivermectin takers had PCR test confirmed COVID and 11.7% non-takers had PCR test confirmed COVID. The people were given two 21 mg doses of Ivermectin. This costs less than 1 penny per person.”
 

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
Well well well. In addition to helping cure covid19 Ivermectin has also shown potential as an anti cancer drug:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114

“Ivermectin has powerful antitumor effects, including the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity, in a variety of cancer cells. This may be related to the regulation of multiple signaling pathways by ivermectin through PAK1 kinase. On the other hand, ivermectin promotes programmed cancer cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Ivermectin induces apoptosis and autophagy is mutually regulated. Interestingly, ivermectin can also inhibit tumor stem cells and reverse multidrug resistance and exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs….”
 
  • Like
Reactions: indynittany

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
16,454
21,017
1
2020evidence.org
Just bumping to remind people of the serious level of censorship rampant in our supposedly free society. Google (YouTube) and Facebook have blood on their hands!
Yep. How ironic that a video about censorship ends up getting censored. Fuuck google/youtube. They can burn in hell for not allowing people access to potentially life saving information on early treatment options re: covid19.
 
  • Like
Reactions: indynittany