I just listened to Ziegler’s appearance yesterday on Kevin Slaten’s show. Ziegler discusses the Sandusky sex tape and how Heim was apparently ready to come to Sandusky's defense when everything hit the fan in November 2011, but was told not to defend Sandusky because a contact of Heim’s, who was apparently close to Ira Lubert, told Heim there was a sex tape of Sandusky with a boy. Heim relays this story to Ziegler, who tries to convince Heim that the story can’t be true since there would be no way such a tape would not have surfaced already given the fire storm around this affair. Heim apparently refuses to believe Ziegler and doesn’t believe his friends at PSU would mislead him. Ziegler indicates that he basically pesters Ira Lubert to confirm if a sex tape ever existed and after a number of attempts in trying to get Lubert to respond, Lubert finally sends Ziegler an email indicating that no sex tape exists. If Ziegler is telling the truth (no reason to expect he isn't), where did this whole sex tape story come from and what role did Ira Lubert play in disseminating it? I find it a very bizarre story.
As a side note, Ziegler discusses the pennlawfumble article and indicates it was written by a prominent lawyer in Northern California, but he does not appear to know who it is. He relays an interesting story that he spoke to Dick Vermeil about the whole Sandusky case and Vermeil (who wrote the introduction to Sanduskys book) told Ziegler that Herman Edwards mentioned to Vermeil a while back that there was a lawyer in California that was going to blow the whole case against Sandusky wide open. So according to Ziegler, Edwards knows who the lawyer is who wrote the article. Ziegler attributes this to Edwards being from California, but he gets it wrong when he indicates Edwards attended Cal – Edwards attended San Diego State (he is from Monterey though). Just found it interesting that Herman Edwards of all people is linked into this whole mess.
As a side note, Ziegler discusses the pennlawfumble article and indicates it was written by a prominent lawyer in Northern California, but he does not appear to know who it is. He relays an interesting story that he spoke to Dick Vermeil about the whole Sandusky case and Vermeil (who wrote the introduction to Sanduskys book) told Ziegler that Herman Edwards mentioned to Vermeil a while back that there was a lawyer in California that was going to blow the whole case against Sandusky wide open. So according to Ziegler, Edwards knows who the lawyer is who wrote the article. Ziegler attributes this to Edwards being from California, but he gets it wrong when he indicates Edwards attended Cal – Edwards attended San Diego State (he is from Monterey though). Just found it interesting that Herman Edwards of all people is linked into this whole mess.
Last edited: