OK, I'm curious. All this talk about whether Grier should or shouldn;t play has revolved around money and injury etc.
One huge issue developed around Grier in his last 2 games (well, for one, he didn't win them, but he played well enough so let's skip that part). What he DID do against better competition was fumble the ball. In the big one, he did it twice and pretty much cost them the game.
So let's say he plays a motivated 'cuse team that kinda gets after the QB. What happens to his stock if he has a 3rd loss and fumbles it again when pressured? My guess is his stock drops.. probably a lot more than it goes up if he has a big game. My opinion might be all wrong, but I see Grier's choice as not taking any chances on getting exposed.
Personally, I wanted to see what he could do against a team not named the Wild Wild West that thrives on pressuring the QB. Guess we won't know how he plays against a real defense til he plays his first NFL game. Stay tuned.
Add on: I'm going to ratchet this up a notch... 'cuse knows he "SEEMS TO" have a fumble problem and they'd be going after him, zeroing in on that apparent weakness. One way to combat that impression is to play, carve the 'cuse secondary up, win big, don't turn it over. My guess is his advisors saw little upside to this when weighed against the risk of getting exposed 3 straight games.... this time against a middling 'cuse. Best to say it's all about getting injured and "prepared" (lmao at that crock; far better "prepared" by preparing to play real people...imo) rather than risk a bad outing. Again, just my opinion. Yours might vary