ADVERTISEMENT

Dave's Templates: 1 down, a new one to go...I'll explain.

BisbeeMike

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2017
1,760
1,209
1
Dave Jones first template to beating PSU was to win time of possession and then finish in the red zone. Pitt provided it, and a better team like Iowa would finish it. Half right. Iowa did in fact finish 3 of 4 shots near the redzone, but nothing like the template would show. Big plays mostly, instead, were the ticket. Iowa, however blew the cred of the old template into the water because they did NOT control the ball and PSU OWNED THE BALL for most of the game, so that template has been discredited.

Now, the NEW template is to surround McSorley with perimeter defenders trying to block passes, or tip passes, and to play soft enough to prevent the big play that goes for the touchdown. That "sort of" worked because we had over 500 yards, but mostly we lost on the right side of the o line down close and it forced us into field goals in the most hostle environment we'll play in this year. One old template debunked, one new template TO debunk vs Indiana.
 
Actually that strategy worked for Pitt. Make McSorley uncomfortable by keeping him in the pocket.
 
McSorley's game winning td pass vs Iowa was from the pocket also. It's not automatic, Trace being the winner he is, CAN beat it also from time to time, but yes, that is the new template that Iowa based, maybe a bit on Pitt. But the time of possession template, that's been debunked as of last night. Penn State controlled the ball all night long.
 
I think Trace plays much better up tempo. Too much slow down whether due to crowd noise or slow calling the play at the line , :(
 
If by "working for Pitt", you mean it enabled them to lose by only 19 points, then yes, it worked for them.

Yes, it kept McSorley off balance and gave him happy feet and PSU "only" scored 33 points against a crappy defense.
 
Dave Jones first template to beating PSU was to win time of possession and then finish in the red zone. Pitt provided it, and a better team like Iowa would finish it. Half right. Iowa did in fact finish 3 of 4 shots near the redzone, but nothing like the template would show. Big plays mostly, instead, were the ticket. Iowa, however blew the cred of the old template into the water because they did NOT control the ball and PSU OWNED THE BALL for most of the game, so that template has been discredited.

Now, the NEW template is to surround McSorley with perimeter defenders trying to block passes, or tip passes, and to play soft enough to prevent the big play that goes for the touchdown. That "sort of" worked because we had over 500 yards, but mostly we lost on the right side of the o line down close and it forced us into field goals in the most hostle environment we'll play in this year. One old template debunked, one new template TO debunk vs Indiana.
Agree with you with one exception.. "Most hostile environment we'll play in this year "... We do play in the Shoe...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JR4PSU and Bertway0
Get pressure with your front four without needing to blitz, as Iowa did, and everything else is easy. That's the template, but if it were actually that easy, everyone would do it.

Hell, arguably the greatest NFL offense of all time featuring Brady, Moss, Welker, etc. got detailed in the Super Bowl by the Giants due to a front four who could get home.
 
Get pressure with your front four without needing to blitz, as Iowa did, and everything else is easy. That's the template, but if it were actually that easy, everyone would do it.

Hell, arguably the greatest NFL offense of all time featuring Brady, Moss, Welker, etc. got detailed in the Super Bowl by the Giants due to a front four who could get home.

"without needing to blitz"?? They blitzed tactfully.
 
ADVERTISEMENT