"Bombshell Claim: More Clinton Sexual Assault Victims Are About To Come Forward"

T J

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
98,099
7,907
1
previously unknown victims who are preparing to come forward with accusations against the former president.

"I identified 24 women who’ve been assaulted by Bill Clinton,"

Are we talking about affairs, or are we talking about assaults?"

"We’re talking about assaults,"

========

Bombshell Claim: More Clinton Sexual Assault Victims Are About To Come Forward

Published January 9, 2016

Since returning to the campaign trail as an advocate for Hillary, Bill Clinton has been harried by renewed interest in his past sexual misconduct as well as Hillary’s alleged role in intimidating his victims into silence.

Roger Stone, author of the New York Times bestselling "The Clinton’s War On Women", claims that he has personal knowledge of previously unknown victims who are preparing to come forward with accusations against the former president.

"I identified 24 women who’ve been assaulted by Bill Clinton," Stone said on The Sean Hannity Show. "Now some of these women are still terrified. Some of them have had IRS audits. Some of them have had their families threatened. But others have come forward."

"Are you saying there's women whose names we don't know that are mentioned in your book or not mentioned in your book that are going to come forward and start telling those stories?" Sean asked.

"Yes, I think it’s very probable," Stone responded. "Not all of them because some of them are still terrified, their families have been threatened, their lives have been threatened."

"Are we talking about affairs, or are we talking about assaults?" asked Hannity.

"We’re talking about assaults," declared Stone. "I don’t want to get out ahead of myself but I think as Broaddrick, and [Kathleen] Willey, and Jones speak out, other women are encouraged who have been assaulted, who have been threatened by Hillary are encouraged by the courage of those three women."

Listen to Roger Stone’s bombshell revelation along with author Ed Klein on The Sean Hannity Show:

http://m.hannity.com/articles/hanpr...clinton-sexual-assault-14252536#ixzz3wh8xibRz
 

SFNit

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2008
6,312
1,714
1
hey, the Reps can come up with 100 new alleged victims, half of them nuns and the other half sitting Federal and state judges and prosecutors, and that wouldn't prove anything.....no convictions=no criminal acts.....all innuendo.....old news....move along....... nothing to see here....
 

MarkPSU

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
4,635
2,247
1
Yes. And there was ZERO physical evidence against Jerry Sandusky.....just a bunch of alleged victims coming forward with their versions. But, JS is in jail where he belongs. And Clinton......
 

Proudlion1

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2004
12,030
847
1
Cli
Yes. And there was ZERO physical evidence against Jerry Sandusky.....just a bunch of alleged victims coming forward with their versions. But, JS is in jail where he belongs. And Clinton......[/QUOTE

Clinton and Cosby to share a cell?
 

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
16,305
5,490
1
Yes. And there was ZERO physical evidence against Jerry Sandusky.....just a bunch of alleged victims coming forward with their versions. But, JS is in jail where he belongs. And Clinton......
How many of those 'victims' received huge $$$ settlements because of their testimony? How many of those 'victims' changed tyheir stories? How many were coached by the prosecution?
JS is in jail, OJ was 'not guilty' of the murder of his wife - the system does not always produce valid results. How can you explain the McMartin Preschool trial outcomes?
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mcmartin/mcmartinaccount.html
 

T J

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
98,099
7,907
1

Remember Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill

Remember the left's battle cry:

"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."
 

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
16,305
5,490
1
Remember Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill

Remember the left's battle cry:

"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."
Fools are not limited to any one party or political leaning (conservative/progressive). To think so is foolish.
 

SFNit

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2008
6,312
1,714
1
How many of those 'victims' received huge $$$ settlements because of their testimony? How many of those 'victims' changed tyheir stories? How many were coached by the prosecution?
JS is in jail, OJ was 'not guilty' of the murder of his wife - the system does not always produce valid results. How can you explain the McMartin Preschool trial outcomes?
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mcmartin/mcmartinaccount.html
Brilliant analogy.....Clinton's accusers were all grown women reporting sexual attacks as they occurred all over the US and abroad, spread out in time over a period of over forty years from Clinton's student days through the time of his presidency versus a group of preschoolers all in one location and in the control of the same group of adults, who only accused the McMartins after considerable and repeated pressure from adults.

Hmmmm, I see your point, we shouldn't jump to any conclusions about the Clinton accusers being truthful when those children were manipulated into lying by over zealous do gooders......
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: royboy

katchthis

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2004
22,357
7,408
1
Sound similar to the Bill Cosby story. Power, threats, and coercion to threaten testimony.
 

SFNit

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2008
6,312
1,714
1
Sound similar to the Bill Cosby story. Power, threats, and coercion to threaten testimony.
Sure does. And, in this case, the power is being applied by the most powerful man in the world, the POTUS, and his freakishly megalomaniac wife who would destroy his accusers for the political careers of her husband and herself.

All of the accusers had to face this kind of coercion alone without any support from fellow victims as they were most likely unaware the others existed (Thanks, HillDog!). They didn't have a chance against that kind of power and corruption.....

HillDog was vicious and relentless.......no wonder they hid away until others got up the nerve and went public. In the meantime, the PC environment in the US evolved to the point that the Bill Cosbys and the BillDogs in this country could be held accountable for their raping and abusing of women. Now it's game on....

After the first successful put down of a "Bimbo Attack" by HillDog, she empowered BillDog to do it over and over. She's responsible as an enabler, accessory before and after the fact.....essentially she was a co-rapist..... I hope we get to see her answer questions about that....
 
Last edited:

JR4PSU

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Sep 27, 2002
40,318
11,026
1
SE PA
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-the-allegations-of-bill-clintons-womanizing/
For over 25 years there has been a whole industry of right wingers dedicated to 'finding' accusations against BC. Remember Scaife and his hired guns at the American Soectator. R. Emmett Tyrell was the leader of that group. Writing a book with accusations - eespecially old ones - does not make those claims true.
Every sexual assault victim deserves to be believed. Hillary's words.
 

T J

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
98,099
7,907
1
Fools are not limited to any one party or political leaning (conservative/progressive). To think so is foolish.


This is the Left's repeated position, drilled into the American public by the Left-wing Media Super Pac. This is the Left's standard... Your Democrat party's standard.

Remember the left's battle cry:

"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant;
it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."