At The End Of His Term Obama Trucked 30 MILLION Pages Of His Admin’s Records To Chicago Promising To Digitize Them Then Never Did

jferretti

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2001
4,020
1,526
1
What part of if it's kosher releasing it won't be an issue do you not understand? If they are so sure of what they did why delay releasing the affidavit. Again false info was used to get warrants on Trump before....why should we blindy trust them now? There is a reason they kicked attorneys out of the search and attempted to shut off the cameras.
And that reason is what? And you know this how? And the proof is where?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaconNitt

dailybuck777

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2018
11,228
16,018
1
This is wrong. Search warrants commonly are issued by Magistrate Judges. It's part of the system and their warrants carry no less authority than had it been issued by the Federal Court Judge.
They are issued by magistrates because they are lower level functions that require less intellectual capital and less judicial knowledge. Magistrates are among the least equipped to make consequential decisions regarding presidential power.
 

MaconNitt

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2016
2,722
3,174
1
What part of if it's kosher releasing it won't be an issue do you not understand? If they are so sure of what they did why delay releasing the affidavit. Again false info was used to get warrants on Trump before....why should we blindy trust them now? There is a reason they kicked attorneys out of the search and attempted to shut off the cameras.
The part where no one ever releases an affidavit before someone is arrested. That giving a person who is being investigated the names of witnesses and the reasons for the investigation can compromise the witnesses safety and jeopardize their case. It doesn't happen. Just because you want the information doesn't mean you can get it now.

If Trump is arrested his lawyers will get to see the affidavit then. Trump only says he wants it now so he can play the victim and fund raise off of it. Just like the cctv video he is dangling out there. If there was evidence of planting information on the video he would have released it by now. If there was evidence of the FBI agents sniffing Melania's panties he would have released it by now.

Just another conspiracy theory you Trumpers lap up. Better make another donation to his defense fund. He is going to need it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumble_lion

ao5884

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2019
7,721
7,848
1
You're citing LBJ and Nixon?! Sigh ...

1. The Presidential Records Act was enacted in 1978, largely in response to Nixon's overreach with respect to records compiled during his presidency, including the infamous tapes. LBJ preceded Nixon.

2. We already know that Obama did not take any documents or records (either classified or unclassified) without first getting approval from NARA. Yet you keep spouting about Obama. (Some people, most notably Trump Cultists, never learn.)

3. Hillary was never president. Don't you understand that?

4. Trump got raided after 18 months because there was a period of negotiations, and then a subpoena that preceded the issuance of a search warrant.

I'm citing the facts.
1.We did not get all of the records from LbJ until 2016.....not one raid

2. Obama not only delayed the release of his own records but Bill Clinton's as well (took 12 years)....not 1 raid.

3. Hillary not being president does not make it OK to mishandled classified info or just randomly delete shit without approval (they literally destroyed hard drives)
Once again not 1 raid

Trump has documents for 18 months......day long raid attorneys kicked out. Attempts to stop filming, random things they had no right to take or search are taken

Do you see the difference or do I need to draw you a picture?
 

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
19,825
25,401
1
2020evidence.org
The part where no one ever releases an affidavit before someone is arrested. That giving a person who is being investigated the names of witnesses and the reasons for the investigation can compromise the witnesses safety and jeopardize their case. It doesn't happen. Just because you want the information doesn't mean you can get it now.

If Trump is arrested his lawyers will get to see the affidavit then. Trump only says he wants it now so he can play the victim and fund raise off of it. Just like the cctv video he is dangling out there. If there was evidence of planting information on the video he would have released it by now. If there was evidence of the FBI agents sniffing Melania's panties he would have released it by now.

Just another conspiracy theory you Trumpers lap up. Better make another donation to his defense fund. He is going to need it.
You left out the part where these same FBI/DOJ pieces of shit have already been shown to have lied and misrepresented about the predicate they have used to get warrents, start investigations, etc. related to Trump in the past (see Carter Page FISA, steele dossier/mueller witch-hunt, etc.). Therefore it’s perfectly justifiable for the American people to see the full unredacted affidavit and any other documents that support the predicate that crimes were committed. Otherwise people will assume the worst bc of the history of unethical and illegal behavior of govt bad actors. They can release enough information to show their predicate was properly backed without compromising anyone’s safety or identity.

The fact the DOJ doesn’t realize this just shows how out of touch they are and how utterly guilty and shitty it makes them look.
 

LafayetteBear

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2009
48,204
21,523
1
They are issued by magistrates because they are lower level functions that require less intellectual capital and less judicial knowledge. Magistrates are among the least equipped to make consequential decisions regarding presidential power.
Wrong, and a stupid post to boot. Well done, Trump Cultist. :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaconNitt

dailybuck777

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2018
11,228
16,018
1
Wrong, and a stupid post to boot. Well done, Trump Cultist. :cool:
Coming from someone who is so ignorant of litigation that you wouldn't know where to sit in a courtroom if you had to walk into one. You are doubling down on your ignorance and stupidity. Search warrants are one-sided applications where the opposing party has no input. To someone halfway familiar with the way law works, it is obvious they are much simpler than matters where both parties have input.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MaconNitt