Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No excuses now that we have some talent! After the years of high-paid, on-the-job training, we should have won a few more close games. I'm tired of seeing Chambers lose the end game!
The 3 scorers are all sophomores and Shep can be a scorer but is streaky as you get. Watkins has greatly improved over the past year as has Lamar. Only one guy seems to be interested in actually playing defense, that is the real problem. Reaves is really being missed. Tone can't be the lone scorer when the game is on the line, Chambers better get someone to play D and find a few scoring plays where Tone is not the shooter or it will be lots more of the same. They are hard to watch but I have lowered my expectations so it has been less stressful the last two games.Dunno. The "talent" are still sophomores. I'd like to give him until the 2016 class runs it's course. If he cannot parlay that class into growth on the court and recruiting, it's probably time.
Just remember that pre-chambers, everyone complained that PSU BB was not competitive. Now the complaints are that PSU BB should be winning a few more close games. It's a significant improvement. I'd like it to be more at this point, but it takes time to restock an empty cupboard and not sure how the depth stacks up which can lead to tired legs and losses at the end. I'm no expert, but calling for his head is potentially short-sighted. It would also depend on who a reasonable replacement would be. Hint: you've probably never heard of him so it would be a small program guy with some moderate success looking to take a big conference job and hoping he can make the leap to big time recruiting and coaching.
So we still have "One in the Chamber?"Anyone still on the Chambers Bandwagon?
Sure, why wouldn't I be?
Anyone still on the Chambers Bandwagon?
Sure, why wouldn't I be?
reaves' missing d has hurt badly. wheeler is good in small spurts, but is too small and offensively lacking to have an impact. it's like playing with 4 guys offensively when he's in, and other teams know it. just pack the middle.The 3 scorers are all sophomores and Shep can be a scorer but is streaky as you get. Watkins has greatly improved over the past year as has Lamar. Only one guy seems to be interested in actually playing defense, that is the real problem. Reaves is really being missed. Tone can't be the lone scorer when the game is on the line, Chambers better get someone to play D and find a few scoring plays where Tone is not the shooter or it will be lots more of the same. They are hard to watch but I have lowered my expectations so it has been less stressful the last two games.
A voice of reason. Thank you.Dunno. The "talent" are still sophomores. I'd like to give him until the 2016 class runs it's course. If he cannot parlay that class into growth on the court and recruiting, it's probably time.
Just remember that pre-chambers, everyone complained that PSU BB was not competitive. Now the complaints are that PSU BB should be winning a few more close games. It's a significant improvement. I'd like it to be more at this point, but it takes time to restock an empty cupboard and not sure how the depth stacks up which can lead to tired legs and losses at the end. I'm no expert, but calling for his head is potentially short-sighted. It would also depend on who a reasonable replacement would be. Hint: you've probably never heard of him so it would be a small program guy with some moderate success looking to take a big conference job and hoping he can make the leap to big time recruiting and coaching.
No excuses now that we have some talent! After the years of high-paid, on-the-job training, we should have won a few more close games. I'm tired of seeing Chambers lose the end game!
This "young" talented group has played in close to 50 college basketball games. The talent is there and so is the experience. They just aren't playing well together and that's on Chambers. This was the easiest first 7 games of the conference schedule
Chambers is so used to losing that he still saves his Time Outs to use when he is losing and trying to get back into the game. The top NCAA coaches use their time outs strategically down the stretch to call a play and extend their lead in the final minutes. There is none of this with our Nits.....the only strategic play that Chambers knows is to give the ball to Carr! The problem is... everyone else also knows this!!!!!Dunno. The "talent" are still sophomores. I'd like to give him until the 2016 class runs it's course. If he cannot parlay that class into growth on the court and recruiting, it's probably time.
Just remember that pre-chambers, everyone complained that PSU BB was not competitive. Now the complaints are that PSU BB should be winning a few more close games. It's a significant improvement. I'd like it to be more at this point, but it takes time to restock an empty cupboard and not sure how the depth stacks up which can lead to tired legs and losses at the end. I'm no expert, but calling for his head is potentially short-sighted. It would also depend on who a reasonable replacement would be. Hint: you've probably never heard of him so it would be a small program guy with some moderate success looking to take a big conference job and hoping he can make the leap to big time recruiting and coaching.
If PSU leadership is ready to make the jump to the next level and open pocket books to hire one of the hottest coach free agents like OSU did this year, Texas Tech did the year prior, etc. then yes. Otherwise, no way do I want to start all over again with some no name from a tiny school that snuck into the dance once. Believe it or not, the life of a coach is much longer in basketball than football. I do question the in game calling but I haven't seen every game. Missed the fiasco from the other night.
Chambers is so used to losing that he still saves his Time Outs to use when he is losing and trying to get back into the game. The top NCAA coaches use their time outs strategically down the stretch to call a play and extend their lead in the final minutes. There is none of this with our Nits.....the only strategic play that Chambers knows is to give the ball to Carr! The problem is... everyone else also knows this!!!!!
Anyone still on the Chambers Bandwagon?
Sure, why wouldn't I be?
No excuses now that we have some talent! After the years of high-paid, on-the-job training, we should have won a few more close games. I'm tired of seeing Chambers lose the end game!
Some people seem to believe that potential recruits and current players don’t care about wins or losses and that as long as he remains, Chambers will steadily improve PSU’s roster. Where do they get this idea ?So what happens to your existing players and Dread if you fire Chambers and hire somebody like Dambrot, the new guy at Duquesne?
Maybe by the fact that Dread (and Bolton) has already signed an LOI. Doubt he'd get out of it because the team is losing. But a coaching change certainly gives him an out.Some people seem to believe that potential recruits and current players don’t care about wins or losses and that as long as he remains, Chambers will steadily improve PSU’s roster. Where do they get this idea ?