Why couldn’t I have been a victim when I was in high school?
Self hating and future latte drinking are not turnons, Bob!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why couldn’t I have been a victim when I was in high school?
I did not have sex at that age, but I certainly had opportunity, so yes, I think a 17 year old can make an informed decision. I knew what I was or wasn't doing.I realize this is an uncomfortable topic to discuss, but since we are already joking about "hot for teacher", I have a question for the men on the board: think back to your younger self at 17 (for personal reference I was 17 when I started as a freshman at University Park). Did you understand the pros and cons of sex? Were you already sexually active? If you were offered sex by a very attractive woman who was 10 years older than you, would you have at least seriously considered it? (Let's assume for the sake my hypothetical that this isn't a person who has power over you, like a teacher; the power dynamic introduces a different set of constraints). What about if a not attractive 50 year old woman offered you sex? You'd probably turn that down, right?
If there are women reading this thread, I'd love their perspective on this as the genders can (often do) have different views on sex at that age.
In other words, did you feel, at 17, that you could make informed decisions about who to have or not have sex with? If the answer is "yes", does that suggest that at least some of our societal/legal definitions of CSA might be wrong?
I realize this is an uncomfortable topic to discuss, but since we are already joking about "hot for teacher", I have a question for the men on the board: think back to your younger self at 17 (for personal reference I was 17 when I started as a freshman at University Park). Did you understand the pros and cons of sex? Were you already sexually active? If you were offered sex by a very attractive woman who was 10 years older than you, would you have at least seriously considered it? (Let's assume for the sake my hypothetical that this isn't a person who has power over you, like a teacher; the power dynamic introduces a different set of constraints). What about if a not attractive 50 year old woman offered you sex? You'd probably turn that down, right?
If there are women reading this thread, I'd love their perspective on this as the genders can (often do) have different views on sex at that age.
In other words, did you feel, at 17, that you could make informed decisions about who to have or not have sex with? If the answer is "yes", does that suggest that at least some of our societal/legal definitions of CSA might be wrong?
some great questions...but I don't think the issue is with the teen age boy or girl, it is on the adult. There is a huge difference between 15~18 and being 23. Especially if you are a teacher. No matter if the student wants sex, the teacher is responsible. Honestly, I don't even know how a teacher lets him/herself get into that situation. At the same time, if a decent looking gal wants to get laid they can go to any club at just about anytime and name the dude.I realize this is an uncomfortable topic to discuss, but since we are already joking about "hot for teacher", I have a question for the men on the board: think back to your younger self at 17 (for personal reference I was 17 when I started as a freshman at University Park). Did you understand the pros and cons of sex? Were you already sexually active? If you were offered sex by a very attractive woman who was 10 years older than you, would you have at least seriously considered it? (Let's assume for the sake my hypothetical that this isn't a person who has power over you, like a teacher; the power dynamic introduces a different set of constraints). What about if a not attractive 50 year old woman offered you sex? You'd probably turn that down, right?
If there are women reading this thread, I'd love their perspective on this as the genders can (often do) have different views on sex at that age.
In other words, did you feel, at 17, that you could make informed decisions about who to have or not have sex with? If the answer is "yes", does that suggest that at least some of our societal/legal definitions of CSA might be wrong?
some great questions...but I don't think the issue is with the teen age boy or girl, it is on the adult. There is a huge difference between 15~18 and being 23. Especially if you are a teacher. No matter if the student wants sex, the teacher is responsible. Honestly, I don't even know how a teacher lets him/herself get into that situation. At the same time, if a decent looking gal wants to get laid they can go to any club at just about anytime and name the dude.
perhaps that is not your point.
I was dating a lot but not sexually active at that time. My Catholic guilt and love for my parents caused me keep it in my pants.
to your last point, regarding laws, it is legal for a 25 year old to have sex with a 17 year old in most states...but not if the 25 year old is a teacher or other similar position (Dr., Counselor, Layer) but these are pretty much state laws. the problem with laws, if they have to be one size fits all. There are a lot of very mature teenagers, and very immature teenagers. Plus, add in booze, weed and drugs and you've got quite a mishmash of laws.
right. agree.How does a teacher let him/herself get into these situations? Because they enjoy the power, and they enjoy the young flesh, whether they initiate it or the teenager does. The teachers are both powerful and weak.
right. agree.
Over the years, I've always been fascinated with the struggle between emotion and logic. it is basic Freud: Id, Ego and Super Ego. The bottom line is that a strong mind controls emotional impulses. A person with anger problems is probably a person that just isn't very "smart". So, I liken these teachers, as you describe them, as just being dumb. Their logic cannot overcome their basic impulses.
I am not sure if there are more incidents or if they are just now being reported. I feel like social media is a big part of the exposure.But-why so many? Or more appropriately, why so many reports of it?
Agreed, but the law, as I understand it, means that even if he was 17, this would have been statutory rape just due to his age and their age difference. Some of other teacher/student examples posted above were, I believe older than 15, but still minors.That is an interesting question.
Keep I mind that this case involves a middle school boy though, not a 17-year old.
Certainly the teacher-student aspect of this is wrong (which I said in my original post). I was merely commenting as to the age issue in general.some great questions...but I don't think the issue is with the teen age boy or girl, it is on the adult. There is a huge difference between 15~18 and being 23. Especially if you are a teacher. No matter if the student wants sex, the teacher is responsible. Honestly, I don't even know how a teacher lets him/herself get into that situation. At the same time, if a decent looking gal wants to get laid they can go to any club at just about anytime and name the dude.
perhaps that is not your point.
I was dating a lot but not sexually active at that time. My Catholic guilt and love for my parents caused me keep it in my pants.
to your last point, regarding laws, it is legal for a 25 year old to have sex with a 17 year old in most states...but not if the 25 year old is a teacher or other similar position (Dr., Counselor, Layer) but these are pretty much state laws. the problem with laws, if they have to be one size fits all. There are a lot of very mature teenagers, and very immature teenagers. Plus, add in booze, weed and drugs and you've got quite a mishmash of laws.
Here is what I think, with absolutely no proof but with the thought of a doctoral disortation on the subject. I think people are naturally drawn to sex of a certain type. Gay, straight, perhaps certain ages. I think these women (as well as Sandusky and other pedophiles) are naturally attracted to whatever it is they have sex with. It doesn’t make it acceptable, but I am of the belief that it is a natural tendency.
This is an interesting perspective, and while I think there is some truth there, I don't think that it is universally true (some women are attractive enough to get any straight guy (including married/taken ones) at the drop of a hat, but certainly all are not. Similarly, there are some guys with an amazing mix of looks and charm that can have almost any woman they want without having to jump through any dating hoops.I pretty much agree. Although, when my wife and I were dating we went to see a one-man show named "defending the caveman". It was awesome. So we were talking about the different between men and woman. We were at a club/restaurant. At one point, she said "here's the difference; look around. see all of these men? If I wanted, I could be in bed with any one of them in as long as it took us to find the bed. Every. Single. One." For me, it was probably like, maybe five gals...and after several dates. So, it seems like it may be that sex is like New Yorkers going to the statue of liberty (they never do because, they can see it anytime they want). I also think of Bett Midler who once said "men give love to get sex while women give sex to get love" (paraphrased).
I am not sure if there are more incidents or if they are just now being reported. I feel like social media is a big part of the exposure.
on why, I have no idea. I get guys, but gals?
I recall some time I spent in Singapore I found their attitude for sex to be fascinating. Prostitution was 100% legal but having a playboy or penthouse would get you some number of lashes. In fact, the group I was with tried to hire a gal to strip and when she found out what they wanted, she was completely offended. Bottom line is that voyerism was illegal, sex was not. I never did the research, but was told that they have almost zero violent crime (murder, rape, etc.). Corporal punishment may have something to do with it, but most there feel that it is because that the titalation of men and outlet for pure sex is a key factor.
Which illustrates another very good point which is that different people maturing (sexually and otherwise) at different ages. I've know 25 year olds that really shouldn't have been sexually active because they weren't acting responsibly AT ALL, but I'm sure there are high school students who are very mature WRT sexual relationships (with their peers).I probably would have just started giggling assuming she was joking and gone back to my Atari 5200.
How does a teacher let him/herself get into these situations? Because they enjoy the power, and they enjoy the young flesh, whether they initiate it or the teenager does. The teachers are both powerful and weak.
Since teachers are considered and viewed as a surrogate parents to students while in school, when intimacy occurs it becomes a criminal act regardless of gender or the age of the student. I do not believe that this young lady understands the consequences of being on a National Sex Offender Registry. All perspective employers will undoubtedly run a background check severely limiting career options. Her husband will most likely divorce her and get custody of the child.
We had a similar incident when I was in HS with a male teacher and a female student. The teacher was arrested, his wife divorced him and if my memory serves me right an attempt was made to take his state pension taken away from him. This misguided decision that lasted all of 15 minutes ruined his life. This is the sobering reality to most of these situations.
She probably fully understands it. But one thing I have learned in 45 years of life is that sex often trumps all reasoning.
I am not sure if there are more incidents or if they are just now being reported. I feel like social media is a big part of the exposure.
on why, I have no idea. I get guys, but gals?
.
Self hating and future latte drinking are not turnons, Bob!
Since teachers are considered and viewed as surrogate parents to students while in school
You were on a latte run and missed it.Where was this advice when I was growing up?
What if it was your son with a male teacher?
I pretty much agree. Although, when my wife and I were dating we went to see a one-man show named "defending the caveman". It was awesome. So we were talking about the different between men and woman. We were at a club/restaurant. At one point, she said "here's the difference; look around. see all of these men? If I wanted, I could be in bed with any one of them in as long as it took us to find the bed. Every. Single. One." For me, it was probably like, maybe five gals...and after several dates. So, it seems like it may be that sex is like New Yorkers going to the statue of liberty (they never do because, they can see it anytime they want). I also think of Bett Midler who once said "men give love to get sex while women give sex to get love" (paraphrased).
I think it very much depends on age. The law did not want to distinguish a difference between a minor and a person of legal age. In other words you serve as a "surrogate parent" to a minor but a mentor to an individual who is 17 or 18 years old. That would provide a legal opening for a teacher to have an affair with an 18 year old high school student. If you research laws pertaining to this subject you will see "surrogate parent" used in some very high profile cases and sited in laws.This is a dangerous notion that I've always been very uncomfortable with, as it opens the door to other forms of abuse as well. Mentors, yes, but teachers shouldn't be encouraged to be surrogate parents.
I could use a Latte with an extra shot today. I'm feeling sleepy...You were on a latte run and missed it.
The teachers are both powerful and weak
Here is what I think, with absolutely no proof but with the thought of a doctoral disortation on the subject. I think people are naturally drawn to sex of a certain type. Gay, straight, perhaps certain ages. I think these women (as well as Sandusky and other pedophiles) are naturally attracted to whatever it is they have sex with. It doesn’t make it acceptable, but I am of the belief that it is a natural tendency.
This is a dangerous notion that I've always been very uncomfortable with, as it opens the door to other forms of abuse as well. Mentors, yes, but teachers shouldn't be encouraged to be surrogate parents.
Straight Women and gay dudes appear to have it made vis-à-vis no strings attached, on demand (almost) sex. No woman to say “no”.I've heard it said (heterosexually speaking) that a woman can have sex anytime she wants to. A man can have sex only when a woman will let him.