I know I'm not the only one, but I just don't get it. The opening salvo of this whole thing was the GJP , then the press conference blaring,
Penn State Graduate Asst. Witnesses Anal Rape In The Locker Room, with the poster boards of photos of Sandusky, Curley, and Shultz.
It seems to me that the witness didn't believe that, nor even Esbach, nor Sandusky's jury, probably not Spanier's either. How do they keep getting away with saying it's true?
Penn State Graduate Asst. Witnesses Anal Rape In The Locker Room, with the poster boards of photos of Sandusky, Curley, and Shultz.
It seems to me that the witness didn't believe that, nor even Esbach, nor Sandusky's jury, probably not Spanier's either. How do they keep getting away with saying it's true?