ADVERTISEMENT

Search results

  1. francofan

    Franco cause of death

    I don’t believe there has been an official cause of death, but the best explanation that I have heard was on John Ziegler’s death of journalism podcast episode 19 (around the 3;30 mark for a couple of minutes). Ziegler said that Franco had a family history of heart disease (father, brother) and...
  2. francofan

    Franco’s public viewing

    I did not have Penn State gear on. I just had on a black leather jacket.
  3. francofan

    Franco’s public viewing

    I got to Acrisure Stadium before noon and started waiting in line. I am guessing that there were 30-40 people in front of me. They started letting people in 10 minutes early at 12:50. I was in the second or third group to be let in the Champions Club. After I signed the guest book, I realized...
  4. francofan

    Franco’s public viewing

    I also went to Acrisure Stadium to pay my respects to Franco and to offer my condolences to Dana and Dok. Dana was very gracious and is doing as well as could be expected. While waiting in line, I had an opportunity to talk to BOT member Brandon Short as well as with ex-BOT member Rob Tribeck...
  5. francofan

    Franco Harris has passed…

    Same with me. I used to listen to the Penn State radio broadcast with Fran Fisher and it sure sounded like Fran was saying Frank O’Harris.
  6. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Not initially. Sandusky absolutely knew the March 1, 2002 date was wrong. At the time of Ziegler's prison interview Jerry also knew something was wrong with the Feb. 9, 2001 date. It took another couple of years before Zig was able to establish the Dec. 29,2000 date. I believe Zig was in touch...
  7. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    OAG troll's favorite, JmmyW, has some very interesting opinions in post #513 of the WTBOH thread. Here are some of the highlights: He believes that 2/9/2001is far more consistent with the evidence than 12/29/2000 regarding the date of the v2 incident. (I believe he is clearly wrong on the...
  8. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    You are welcome to your own opinions and I don't wish to waste any more of my time responding to them.
  9. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    You sound like Nixon in his I am not a crook speech. It is readily apparent that you are a troll. I don't believe that you have no connection to the OAG. You have no explanation for your motivation in your incessant need to comment on anything that runs counter to the highly suspicious actions...
  10. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Jerry - thank you for your kind words. For what it is worth, I am sincere in my beliefs and don't believe that I am in denial; but rather am confident in my understanding of what I have learned about what has happened and what hasn't happened in this saga. I also believe I am realistic in that...
  11. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    McQueary is not a credible witness. He told 4 or 5 different versions of what happened. None of the 5 people who he told of the incident contemporaneously in 2001 said he told them he witnessed a sexual assault. He didn't recall any hint of a sexual assault until 10 years later. NCIS special...
  12. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Yes, MM saw Jerry in a shower with Allan Myers, a 13 year old boy who was like a son to Jerry. Allan asked Jerry to stand with him on senior night in his last home high school football game. Allan invited Jerry and Dottie to his wedding. Allan also wrote two letters to the editor in local...
  13. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Because you only regurgitate the OAG false narratives of 2011 and you have a totally closed mind toward all of new developments that demonstrate something is very wrong with the conventional wisdom. None of the developments over the last 10 years support your OAG narratives. Do you have any...
  14. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Whether or not Ziegler agreed to debate, Jmmy is still wrong and you are unable to refute Ziegler and Schultz. You are just regurgitating OAG propaganda which is what I expect from an OAG troll. Please keep this baloney off this thread. If you must post, please start you own thread or move to...
  15. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    JmmyW is wrong. I had a back and forth with him and he is totally unconvincing. Feb. 9 was not a quiet night on campus as MM said that the night of the v2 incident was. If you wish to dispute, please refute what Ziegler has stated in the article I linked to or state where Gary Schultz is wrong...
  16. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    John Ziegler has shown the real date of the v2 incident is Dec. 29, 2000 and not either of the dates that the OAG claimed it happened - March 1, 2002 (in the knowingly false grand jury presentment) or Feb. 9, 2001 (as claimed at trial). Both Gary Schultz and Malcolm Gladwell are convinced that...
  17. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    I don’t believe I have ever said that Jerry was close to his freedom. I also don’t believe you have stated anything that supports your assertion that I am blindly gullible.
  18. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Please provide me an example of where I sound blindly gullible if you can. I didn’t think you would identify any conspiracy theories I subscribe to because there aren’t any. I also didn’t think you would identify any credible evidence that Sandusky was a child molester because it just doesn’t...
  19. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    I wasn’t asking you and I am not interested in going back and forth with an anonymous OAG troll who is only interested in OAG propaganda and disinformation.
  20. francofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    It should be, but not in Pennsylvania where judges are elected and are greatly influenced by public opinion. The OAG with the help of a compliant media did a very good job of influencing public opinion with their false narratives including that Mike McQueary witnessed an anal rape.
ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back