WHAT ABOUT THE PROFESSIONALS AT DPW AND 2ND MILE WHO ARE TRAINED TO SPOT PEDOPHILES. THEY WERE IN POSITION TO ORDER JERRY NOT TO TAKE ANYMORE KIDS BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROGRAM, BUT AFTER THEY INVESTIGATED THE 1998 INCIDENT, THEY DID NOT - WHY NOT?
IT HAS BEEN A WHILE SINCE I READ JZ'S EVIDENCE WHY THE VICTIMS WERE LYING. I BELIEVE HE MAINLY ATTACKED THEIR TIME LINES AND HOW THEIR STORIES CHANGED AFTER BEING COACHED BY THEIR LAWYERS. I AM THE ONE TO ATTACK THE KID'S CREDIBILITY OVER DOTTIE, BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN AROUND PLENTY OF KIDS. BTW, HAVE YOU READ THE NEW EVIDENCE ABOUT AARON FISHER AND ALAN MYERS, YOU SHOULD - IT MAY BLOW YOUR MIND.
MY POINT IS WHY DIDN'T HE PERFORM ON THE ADOPTIVE AND FOSTER KIDS. HE ALREADY GROOMED THEM AND THEY FELT OBLIGED TO BE IN HIS HOME. ANY OF THEM COULD HAVE JOINED MATT AND SAID JERRY TOUCHED THEM WHILE TUCKING THEM IN AND GOT A COOL $3 MIL. I THINK THAT INSTEAD OF YOU BEING MAD AT JZ FOR TRIPPING UP MATT, YOU SHOULD BE GLORIFYING THE KIDS WHO DID NOT SELL OUT, WHEN IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SO EASY!
Just a few days ago, a report was released about Dauphin County CYS's failures to protect children from abuse and neglect in the Tutko case. In that case, one caseworker went to the home and concluded intervention was needed. What did CYS do? Sent another caseworker out to conclude differently.
Gee, doesn't that sound just like what happened in the 1998 case? CYS had a report from a PhD psychologist (though they deny it) that said Sandusky was exhibiting the traits of a pedophile. They got a second opinion from an unlicensed counselor, who contradicted the psychologist -- and used that instead.
Were you not aware this happened?
Next, you speak to the credibility of the victims. In high profile cases, there will be a few charlatans who show up. Aaron Fisher isn't one of them because JERRY confirmed his report of child abuse. Read the transcripts. Of course, Jerry denied doing anything sexual with Aaron, as would any molester, but consider the manner of his denial. When asked did your hands go below Aaron's waist, Jerry responded: "I can't honestly say whether they did or didn't." Even so, JERRY admitted to being in bed with Fisher, having Fisher lay on top of him, and to blowing raspberries on his stomach.
Who blows raspberries on the stomach of a 15 year old? I'll tell you who, someone who is performing oral sex on a child and needs to have some kind of story of plausible deniability.
Let me ask you a question Todd. If you walked into your child's bedroom and saw a man crouched between your child's legs with his head in close proximity to the child's genitals, what would you think was happening?
And if the perp said he was just blowing "raspberries" on your child's stomach, would you believe it?
I get it, though. You are giving Jerry the benefit of the doubt. He was just a strange duck with boundary issues.
Well, here's the thing. In a court of law, a judge will instruct a jury to convict if the evidence is conclusive beyond a reasonable doubt. Some judges will go as far as to explain the difference between reasonable doubt and capricious doubt.
The jury ruled correctly. All doubt in this case is capricious.
