And they'd all blame Jay.
Now why didn't I think of that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And they'd all blame Jay.
The Van Natta article was 89% fiction.30 January 2012 is the date for all of the notes I posted. After those entries, nothing else is in the notebook...but there's a boat load of stuff before them.
The gambling and illegal benefits information was passed onto the NCAA as they were "monitoring the progress" of the investigation. The gambling wouldn't have helped the NCAA because it was outside the SOL. Illegal benefits is a minor violation, so also not helpful to the NCAA who was looking to come down hard on PSU.
So, "NCAA - waiting for Freeh Report" (or something big to punish PSU with)
Obviously, I knew about McQ's gambling long before Van Natta wrote his article. One time I made a cryptic reference to it on twitter as part of a discussion of McQueary #PeteRose
So what was fact vs. fiction?The Van Natta article was 89% fiction.
Obviously the other 11%.....So what was fact vs. fiction?
I suspect the "protection" going on is not only to hide the Old Guard BOT member's corruption, but to hid the Commonwealth's corruption as well. That appears to be the reason why the Board was restructured to add six seats that could be controlled by the Old Guard -- to offset new appointees by Governor Wolf.Are all 18 in the same boat, whatever that boat is? There has been some turnover in that group since 2011. The replacements appear to be like-minded, but are they in the same boat as the ones they replaced?
Assuming all 18 at any point (i.e., accounting for turnover) are on the same ground in protecting something, I can't believe they all have the same stake in protecting whatever it is that is being protected. Thus, some must be thinking of saving themselves. Otherwise, what hold do the few have over the rest? Perhaps whatever is behind this is not limited to these trustees. Maybe it involves the state government. There must be some outside powerful influence involved. I don't think any of these trustees wield enough power on their own to take hold of the entire group.
Smoking Gun!
It is nearly certain that the Curley email regarding Joe's input was altered.
In my San Diego presentation, I discussed the emails at length. In 2001, there were five emails that were used as exhibits in the Freeh Report. Only two of the five had the html tags. Each of emails were used as "evidence" by Freeh that the Big 4 were doing something nefarious. As it turned out, the second email discussion of the "coach" was Jerry Dunn -- not Joe.
The other problem with the email (5G) is that it has the WRONG signature block at the bottom. It should be Schultz's, not Spanier's. This occurs twice in the 2001 emails.
As mhentz said - and as I have said since August 2012, all the University has to do to put this to rest is pull the original files from the server and compare to the ones in the Freeh Report.
There are five emails from 2001, two of the five have html tags and three do not. It his was simply an error caused from a transfer from Eudora to Outlook, then all five would have the error.
I want all of these suits to go to trial, and I want CSS to go to trial. The power brokers are avoiding getting any of the real players under oath, and there must be a very good reason for that.
CSS are most responsible for preventing their suit from going to trial. They have a very good reason for that - they stay out of jeopardy and they're not paying their legal bills anyways.
CSS are most responsible for preventing their suit from going to trial. They have a very good reason for that - they stay out of jeopardy and they're not paying their legal bills anyways.
CSS are most responsible for preventing their suit from going to trial..
CSS are responsible for Hoover's inability to make timely rulings?
Question for Ray- have you compared the emails in the Freeh Report to the OAG's copies in their filings? Formatting slightly different, as well as differing time stamps.
CSS are responsible for the appeals they have made, some of which were simply requests for delays.
CSS could also just not appeal Baldwin's inclusion. If they truly told the truth, they'd have nothing to fear from her testimony.
Anybody who works in IT or, hell, has been on the internet for longer than a few years, knows the implication that HTML tags' presence means something is horseshit. Just think about how often somebody's misconfigured Apple Mail client spits out garbage on your neighborhood's email listserv even today (due to their directional quotes, for instance).
These emails are back from the day when some people were on the mainframe, some were using personal email clients (I remember Eudora being mentioned), etc.
There is no excuse for Hoover's failure to rule in a timely manner, and that's not CSS's fault.
CSS are responsible for the appeals they have made, some of which were simply requests for delays.
CSS could also just not appeal Baldwin's inclusion. If they truly told the truth, they'd have nothing to fear from her testimony.
Administration and Athletic Dept on different servers with different time settings? Sounds like Schultz and Curley may have been on different servers. I think all of the recovered emails came from Schultz's personal archive. Sequencing still seems oddCurious. How did the 1998 Email time stamps get out of sequence? Are you insinuating that Freeh was just a bad proof reader? Surly as thorough as he was, he would have noticed the transfers not syncing correctly and notated that in his report.
Curious. How did the 1998 Email time stamps get out of sequence? Are you insinuating that Freeh was just a bad proof reader? Surly as thorough as he was, he would have noticed the transfers not syncing correctly and notated that in his report.
That would be too easy.In my San Diego presentation, I discussed the emails at length. In 2001, there were five emails that were used as exhibits in the Freeh Report. Only two of the five had the html tags. Each of emails were used as "evidence" by Freeh that the Big 4 were doing something nefarious. As it turned out, the second email discussion of the "coach" was Jerry Dunn -- not Joe.
The other problem with the email (5G) is that it has the WRONG signature block at the bottom. It should be Schultz's, not Spanier's. This occurs twice in the 2001 emails.
As mhentz said - and as I have said since August 2012, all the University has to do to put this to rest is pull the original files from the server and compare to the ones in the Freeh Report.
I'm saying they got these emails off a variety of different systems, running different email clients, and even printed some of them and then scanned them years later. To assert that any discrepancies in what you think are timestamps on these things proves anything is delusional.
I'm saying they got these emails off a variety of different systems, running different email clients, and even printed some of them and then scanned them years later. To assert that any discrepancies in what you think are timestamps on these things proves anything is delusional.
Lane is the guy that started the crazy conspiracy theories surrounding the Kennedy Assassination. He got everything wrong and questioned the validity of an investigation of a crime that was the most scrutinized in this nations history. Lane is the reason 70% of Americans believe in theories concerning the assassination that don't make sense.Reading Mr. Blehar's stuff reminds me of a guy named Mark Lane. Similiar styles. He wrote a book "Rush to Judgement".
Do you have any experience with email server software other than what you've either read online or been told?This is also complete horseshit. The answer with any of this is It Depends. If you don't know how they were transferred (were they saved? Were they forwarded by a third party with another email client? [...], you have no idea.
No IT person would ever look at any of the things Ray points to here as any kind of evidence other than that email formatting is a freaking mess in general.
Lane is the guy that started the crazy conspiracy theories surrounding the Kennedy Assassination. He got everything wrong and questioned the validity of an investigation of a crime that was the most scrutinized in this nations history. Lane is the reason 70% of Americans believe in theories concerning the assassination that don't make sense.
Do you have any experience with email server software other than what you've either read online or been told?
Emails are date/time stamped on the sending server - not the receiving server - and they are 100% NOT updated once created. This has been the standard since around 1997, it was done so that law enforcement would have a reliable evidence trail (now it is entirely possible for someone to write code to update the timestamps, but they would have to do so on ALL copies of the original email - something that is damned near impossible).
You are throwing shit at the fan and hoping no one smells it for what it is.
Hmmm. Sounds like some pretty sloppy work putting them back together with no explanation from Freeh as to why, doesn't it. But we have a simple solution, don't we.
You can join the rest of us in requesting the original Email files and electronic source data used by Freeh.
Unless, of course, you're throwing everything you have against the wall in a desperate attempt to defend some guys who f'ed up.
Let's hope the guys who "f'ed up" go to trial, so we can find out what really happened instead of reading this crap every day. You, for one, a relatively new poster, seem to have a very big interest in this all of a sudden. And on top of it all, you proclaim that it just so happens that you are an expert at running email servers from that precise period of time. What a coincidence!
Let's hope the guys who "f'ed up" go to trial, so we can find out what really happened instead of reading this crap every day. You, for one, a relatively new poster, seem to have a very big interest in this all of a sudden. And on top of it all, you proclaim that it just so happens that you are an expert at running email servers from that precise period of time. What a coincidence!
Yeah, I believe that.
Let's hope the guys who "f'ed up" go to trial, so we can find out what really happened instead of reading this crap every day. You, for one, a relatively new poster, seem to have a very big interest in this all of a sudden. And on top of it all, you proclaim that it just so happens that you are an expert at running email servers from that precise period of time. What a coincidence!
Yeah, I believe that.
I was banned from here for several years, genius. And the time I ran servers at my desk was early 90s, not early 00s, but that definitely puts my knowledge ahead of you guys and Ray, who's at the "This tape has a time code, which I'm told is very difficult to fake!" level.
Outstanding. No matter someone's opinion about this thread, there is no good response for that question. Well done.If you're so computer savvy, how was it that you weren't able to get around the ban?