See the link below. From the article:
“UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — After a decade of serving on the Penn State Board of Trustees, including three years as chair, Mark Dambly’s term at the helm officially ended today (Nov. 13) with leadership of the board transitioning to long-time vice chair Matt Schuyler. Penn State Today sat down with Dambly to reflect on his time with the board:
TODAY: You served for a number of years before being elected as vice chair in 2016 and chair in 2017. What made you decide to run for a leadership position?
DAMBLY: I had served as chair of a number of committees and I had been on the executive committee. I felt like I had something to offer in terms of my leadership skills and as a proud alumnus. I sensed a unique opportunity to work with my colleagues to restore trust, transparency and collegiality. I was encouraged by a number of board members to pursue leadership, so I took the opportunity. Ira Lubert when he was chair gave me the opportunity to work hand-in-hand with him as vice chair, and so when Ira decided not to pursue a second term, it seemed natural to me to run for chair.
TODAY: Right. Lubert was elected chair and you vice chair in 2016. Can you talk more about your relationship with him and how that influenced your leadership style?
DAMBLY: Ira and I are close, personal friends. When he became chair and I became vice chair, we were almost interchangeable from a leadership perspective. He offered me the opportunity to be involved in every conversation, every decision, every meeting. It gave me an incredible opportunity to have insight into what the roles, responsibilities and obligations are to be chair.”
And,
“TODAY: When you began as board chair, what were some of your main priorities?
DAMBLY: One of my main objectives was to increase the level of trust and transparency within the board. We embarked on a process of very open leadership. We do twice monthly calls between board meetings. We’ve opened up all of the committee meetings and scheduled these meetings so every trustee can attend every meeting. If a trustee has a particular interest in a subject matter, they can engage in the conversations whether they are on the committee or not...Ultimately, we’ve increased transparency and trust, and that’s helped to lower the temperature in the room and significantly improve collegiality overall.”
And,
“TODAY: What are some other areas of progress?
DAMBLY: The University’s fiscal aspects are very important to us. We worked with President [Eric] Barron to bring in a consultant to do an optimization study to help the board and the University assess opportunities for efficiencies and savings. The University has harvested hundreds of millions of dollars in savings as a result, in areas such as procurement, benefits and IT. The study also identified new opportunities for revenue growth.
We’ve also increased accessibility for key University stakeholders to the trustees. Under my leadership, at each board meeting we have separate meetings with the student leadership, the Faculty Senate leadership and the staff leadership, all to increase accessibility to the trustees.”
It’s called leading.
“UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — After a decade of serving on the Penn State Board of Trustees, including three years as chair, Mark Dambly’s term at the helm officially ended today (Nov. 13) with leadership of the board transitioning to long-time vice chair Matt Schuyler. Penn State Today sat down with Dambly to reflect on his time with the board:
TODAY: You served for a number of years before being elected as vice chair in 2016 and chair in 2017. What made you decide to run for a leadership position?
DAMBLY: I had served as chair of a number of committees and I had been on the executive committee. I felt like I had something to offer in terms of my leadership skills and as a proud alumnus. I sensed a unique opportunity to work with my colleagues to restore trust, transparency and collegiality. I was encouraged by a number of board members to pursue leadership, so I took the opportunity. Ira Lubert when he was chair gave me the opportunity to work hand-in-hand with him as vice chair, and so when Ira decided not to pursue a second term, it seemed natural to me to run for chair.
TODAY: Right. Lubert was elected chair and you vice chair in 2016. Can you talk more about your relationship with him and how that influenced your leadership style?
DAMBLY: Ira and I are close, personal friends. When he became chair and I became vice chair, we were almost interchangeable from a leadership perspective. He offered me the opportunity to be involved in every conversation, every decision, every meeting. It gave me an incredible opportunity to have insight into what the roles, responsibilities and obligations are to be chair.”
And,
“TODAY: When you began as board chair, what were some of your main priorities?
DAMBLY: One of my main objectives was to increase the level of trust and transparency within the board. We embarked on a process of very open leadership. We do twice monthly calls between board meetings. We’ve opened up all of the committee meetings and scheduled these meetings so every trustee can attend every meeting. If a trustee has a particular interest in a subject matter, they can engage in the conversations whether they are on the committee or not...Ultimately, we’ve increased transparency and trust, and that’s helped to lower the temperature in the room and significantly improve collegiality overall.”
And,
“TODAY: What are some other areas of progress?
DAMBLY: The University’s fiscal aspects are very important to us. We worked with President [Eric] Barron to bring in a consultant to do an optimization study to help the board and the University assess opportunities for efficiencies and savings. The University has harvested hundreds of millions of dollars in savings as a result, in areas such as procurement, benefits and IT. The study also identified new opportunities for revenue growth.
We’ve also increased accessibility for key University stakeholders to the trustees. Under my leadership, at each board meeting we have separate meetings with the student leadership, the Faculty Senate leadership and the staff leadership, all to increase accessibility to the trustees.”
It’s called leading.